Interview with the Vampire (2022)

Written by GenerationofSwine on January 10, 2023

So this is one of those titles that IMDb will remove your review if it's not positively glowing.

I'm not sure why, the source material was already really progressive. It was essentially a story about two Gay men who happen to be vampires... and their violent break up. But it was subtle, it was artistic, and it had more of a story to tell about good and evil among other things.

Subtle is the key, because in the 2022 version, there is nothing subtle or artistic. Vampires can't have sex in the novels to up the sexual tension and angst. In this title I guess they didn't think it would be woke enough if it wasn't 9 and 1/2 Weeks with Vampires.

And then they changed Louis, which means that they had to change the entire timeline of the title, and that caused a little bit of complications with everything else, because even though there was a strong message about freeing his slaves in the book... they couldn't have it in the movie...

...Because when you are woke things don't need to make any sense.

And they aged Claudia up, and that presented significant changes and relieved some of what made her character so compelling.

In the end they took a beautiful novel and turned it into cheap fan fiction porn with politics and the people are eating it up.

Because in this day and age, you can't respect the source material, you have to trash it.