Item: Seeing Red (1x4)
Language: en-US
Type of Problem: Incorrect_content
Extra Details: It is more than evident by now that save for Mr Matt Lintz & Ms Yasmeen Fletcher with the obvious exception of eponymous-/lead-/title-character of Ms Vellani's role, every other "Regular" is not gonna have ‘(credit only)’ privilege unlike few of the "Guest Stars," paradoxically.
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by Rebecca
on September 10, 2022 at 8:32 AM
I'm sorry, but could you please explain what is exactly wrong with episode 4's data?
Reply by maazkalim
on September 10, 2022 at 2:40 PM
Pardon my lack-of-patience, but..
...Given that I'm completely not in a mood nowadays more often than not and currently seething owing to getting royally […] by yet-another but "basic-necessities"/infrastructural Big Business, ..
...I could not afford to give less of 2 hoots to elaborate on my point meant to eventually be considered serieswide, I guess must've been restricted to and allowed to post only-&-only for a single episode, even in a predefined "miniseries" title — so that must be why I chose the 4th part, "Seeing Red" primarily/simply because quite the notable changes in cast-credits, as spelled-out in that reference-point of aforementioned 2 thespians' full, end credits-card and yes, in addition to so-called "Main-on-End" crediting technique favoured by the so-called "MCU" productions since past several years — started occurring only after the main-plot actually relocated to Greater Karāchī.
Hope that helps. Since that is the Best I could help pro bono right these times, otherwise I would end-up doing something impetuous. So I hope this gives you the idea for not just this, but all of my "Casting"-centric threads I've made since finally joining this website few weeks ago, after originally learning about it from a rather snob C-suite exec of for-profit "VOD search-engine" in audiovisual-media directory website few-years/several months-&-months ago.
In fact, I successfully resisted quite a-plenty of my moments of temptation[ to correct/edit], but for better or worse: The lack of thorough coverage, even if inaccurate, is nowhere remotely-near the amazon®'s own for-profit, originally UKGB"NI"-based database — with its very successful brand-recognition, so much so that their fellow C-suite types in rest of non-news media still use the purported gross-average of "Critic Reviews" & "User Ratings" of a production they're hawking as some seal-of-creativity/-trust, as if keyboard-warring "anti-wOkE" types haven't swarmed that place to turn it into yet-another hardly-repairable sewer in yet-another nook-&-corner of 'pop-Interweb' multiverse since about a decade or so — at the very least.
Gotta concede though, the situation has considerably bore fruit of my patience, as its catalogue has now expanded to virtually cover/include every single audiovisual-content title I get interested in.
And that is why I deleted my 11+ years-old "Contributor" account/ID on that for-profit, flagship database without less-than-sufficient/much-of-a thought once I came to knew why that aforementioned streaming-search engine would use this platform for their metadata purposes, even as the former is ["somehow" ]still a "boon" for media-marketers to do the "humble-bragging" for the hopes/prayers of triggering Word of Mouth, instead of something "organic", like letting it begin on its own and exploiting it only then.